| Below is a paper written by Loren
Pilling M.D., who found the first pain clinic at the Mayo Clinic. It describes beautifully
what happens emotionally when patients suffer chronic physical pain. Also please read my
paper: "Yesterdays Dentistry, Todays Chronic
Pain". It is an autobiographical account of my experiences as a chronic
pain patient. Chronic Pain: The Ultimate Stress
Loran F. Pilling, M.D.
Health Professionals spend much of their time identifying and then eliminating the
causes of pain, thus providing relief for the patient. In most cases this approach is
successful and the patient is relieved of a most stressful situation. Even though pain is
a very necessary warning signal of a disorder of the body or mind, it is nonetheless
stressful to the person experiencing it. It is the most demanding of all symptoms. The
patient wants immediate relief, and the doctor, sensing this urgency, finds himself
stressed as well. If the pain process is short-lived the patient's reaction is generally
limited to the physiological and psychological consequences of anxiety and fear. Since the
process is of short duration, major problems seldom develop. This type of pain is
generally referred to as acute pain. Simple pain is a much better term to use for pain of
short duration because it suggests that complications seldom develop. Using the same
reasoning, pain of longer duration, formerly referred to as chronic pain, is better called
complicated pain. The complications referred to are the reactions to prolonged stress.
These reactions increase in number and in intensity the longer the pain persists. As these
complications continue they reduce the individual's tolerance to pain, thus increasing his
perception of pain and in turn, his distress from it. To give optimal care to the patient
who is experiencing pain, the doctor not only must attempt to find the cause of the pain
and eliminate it, but he must also help the patient manage the reaction to stress which
accompanies this pain process. The intensity of the physician's reaction will be directly
related to the intensity of the stress as he perceives it. The most important aspect to
remember is that it is the patient's perception of stress and not the doctor's which is at
issue. Doctors frequently forget that the patient may be going through this experience for
the first time, even though the physicians may have observed this experience many times in
their practice. Whether the stress reaction is mild or severe it always takes the same
course, varying only in degree.
Change from
the traditional and familiar to the new and unfamiliar is the common denominator of the
stress reaction. The initial stage is a superficial, stopgap measure to protect the
individual from a new unfamiliar event. Denial and bargaining become the initial line of
defense. Denial is the attempt to eliminate the problem by pretending it doesn't exist. At
this stage, the patient, does not admit to himself or others that he feels threatened by
the symptom. He therefore does nothing physically or psychologically about it. He either
will take no action to seek help or if he does contact his doctor he will tend to minimize
the importance of the situation. The value of denial is that it allows the patient a brief
period of time to become familiar with a new situation so that appropriate action can be
taken. Denial only becomes pathological if it continues, thus preventing the patient from
progressing through the stress reaction to completion, and if it persists, the doctor may
become confused because the repressed anxiety increases the intensity of the patient's
pain by lowering his pain tolerance. The patient, in a very demanding way, complains
loudly of the pain, but shows very little personal distress. The doctor, confused by this
attitude, refers to the patient as neurotic, malingering or hysterical. In reality the
patient is going through a normal stress reaction and has become fixated in the first
stage. The doctor can help the patient to move on from this stage by insisting that they
talk about the real feelings of anxiety and fear that must be present.
Bargaining, the other process that occurs in the initial superficial response to
stress, is the attempt to undo what has happened. The magical thinking of the child's
mind, which we all carry into adulthood, is called into play during this phase. A child
believes the thought is the same as the act. Patients in this stage will often use the
phrase, "if only" because they are attempting to undo the stress. For example,
the dental patient might say, "if only I flossed regularly as my hygienist
suggested." This attempt to "undo" becomes pathological if it prevents the
patient from doing something effective about the stressful situation. "Doctor
shopping" is a common behavior pattern of people in this stage of the stress
reaction.
The next stages of the stress reaction are anger and depression. These are referred to
as the deeper levels of defense. Anger, by definition, is a state of tension and hostility
directed against one who inflicts a real or supposed wrong, as when an expectation is
unfulfilled or a goal is not achieved. When a patient experiences pain, the expectation is
that the doctor can remove the pain. If this is frustrated, anger obviously results. Anger
is a normal response to stress, be it pain, change or loss. Unfortunately, most people
were taught early in life to repress anger, especially toward authority, because the
accompanying behavior was not acceptable. Doctors in our society are seen as authority
figures. Anger has more energy than any other feeling. When it is repressed the energy
builds up and eventually produces depression or physiological responses such as muscle
tension. Some of the anger may escape the repression and be expressed indirectly by
teasing, joking and martyrdom.
Another common method of indirectly dealing with anger is referred to as
passive-aggressive behavior in which the person does nothing or does the opposite of what
is expected. Even some direct methods of expressing anger are destructive, such as blaming
others, revenge, or self-blame. Revenge is a particularly destructive method of dealing
with anger because it has a two4old effect. The patient suffers internally as he ruminates
about his feeling and then later causes suffering to others when he directs the full force
of his anger outward. In our present day society, litigation has become a socially
acceptable way to seek revenge because it is supported and encouraged by our legal system.
Depression, which is felt as a loss of interest, occurs when anger is repressed. This
symptom lowers pain tolerance more effectively than any other factor. With this lowered
pain tolerance, the person's perception of pain increases. The doctor now becomes confused
and often angry because the patient's complaints of pain far outweigh the organic
findings. If the doctor becomes too frustrated by this experience he may attack or reject
the patient whom he sees as a neurotic, and with this attack, the patient either responds
with anger or hurt. Added to the depression, this further lowers his tolerance to pain. An
additional breakdown in the doctor-patient relationship occurs when the patient perceives
the doctor as a God-like individual who can always produce what the patient wants.
Paralleling this, the doctor's expectations of the patient are frequently frustrated
because he expects the patient to recover when treated.
In the proper management of the stress reaction to pain (or to any other illness; for
that matter), the patient needs an opportunity to express his anger and frustration over
what he is experiencing. The doctor who can present himself as an understanding and
accepting authority is the best individual to encourage the patient to release these
feelings. Patients who are allowed to talk about these feelings to an understanding
listener can generally rid themselves of distress in a few minutes and move on to the next
stage in a stress reaction without experiencing depression.
The stress reaction is resolved when the stage of acceptance is reached. At this point
the patient no longer denies what has happened, is not trying to undo the process, and for
all practical purposes is ready to face reality and not wallow in anger, frustration,
guilt, self-pity and depression. He cooperates fully with the doctor by putting his energy
into whatever treatment modality is indicated. If the pain process cannot be eliminated,
and the person must learn to cope with pain, he can accept the situation and work on
methods to raise his pain tolerance. In the past, drug addiction from prescribed narcotics
was all the physician had to offer patients with chronic pain. Now, with the understanding
of chronic pain, the doctor can offer the individual an active productive life. Pain is
not a disability, only the reaction to pain may be disabling.
Loran F. Pilling, M.D. / Vernon D. Gray, M.D.
Anthology of Craniomandibular Orthopedics Volume 1 |